Tuesday, April 23, 2013

More updates on the ASDB situation

Supt Hill uses I. King Jordan's playbook:


ASBD Report Update - April 22, 2013 - 6:30 pm

* Hill Finally Issues Email & Shows He is Completely Out of Touch with Reality
* How Low Can He Go? 2013 ASDB ASL Literacy Summer Camp Cancelled
* ASDB Student Protest Leader Turns 18 Today, Admin Can't Ask If Parents Gave Her Permission to Protest Anymore

* Hill Finally Issues Email & Shows He is Completely Out of Touch with Reality

After two weeks of intense speculation about his whereabouts and apparent refusal to lead ASDB, Supt. Robert Hill finally issued a campus-wide email and commenters say that Hill's email is the proverbial "last nail in the coffin" for Hill as the email does NOT make a single reference to the student protests taking place at both Tucson and Phoenix campuses during the worst crisis ever faced by ASDB in its 100+ years of existence.

Instead, Hill used the bulk of the email to respond to absurd allegations and rumors that many already know to be false.

Hill also repeatedly claimed that he was the target and victim of "personal attacks" and referenced a "cause" and a "select group of individuals."

Many see these subtle references as an outrageous attempt by Hill to turn this crisis into a "Deaf vs. Hearing" issue when it is clearly and simply a matter of a group of students, staff, parents, and community members asking for the removal of an ineffective, unethical, and vindictive superinteddent as well as the removal of a corrupt board chairman who, with the active friendship and collusion of Hill, has clearly broken several conflict of interests provisions as required by State law and ASDB policy.

Hill's bizarre rambling "conspiracy theory" email, in which he refuses to even acknowledge the existence of the protests, clearly shows that he is no longer fit to lead this school and needs to go.

Text of the campus-wide email by Hill:

TO: ALL AGENCY STAFF
FROM: ROBERT HILL, SUPERINTENDENT
DATE: APRIL 22, 2013
SUBJECT: RECENT EVENTS

The Agency has been flooded with rumors, accusation and untruths in the last few weeks, which are being spread by a select group of individuals. I want to thank the many employees who have focused their efforts in attending to the educational programming of students, and displayed continued professionalism in the wake of the fabrications and potential distractions.

A number of employees have reported they have been asked to sign petitions to support the efforts of this select group and have expressed fear of retaliation if they don’t sign. I want employees to know they have every right to sign any petition they so choose. It is also important for employees to know they do not have to sign any petition and that ASDB does not tolerate reprisals of any kind. Therefore, it is extremely important for employees who are concerned of retaliation to report their concerns to the Superintendent and/or the Human Resources Director. ASDB cannot address employee fears if no reports are filed or if anonymous reports are filed. I want to assure employees that confidentiality will be maintained to every extent possible, and ASDB will take the necessary actions to protect employees from inappropriate treatment.

The false information being spread is a concerted effort to instill fear in others so as to further the “cause” of a group of individuals. I wish to address some of the false information you may have heard. This list is not intended to be all-inclusive, but is intended to address the more significant concerns that have been brought to my attention.

Termination of Deaf Staff
Perhaps the most outrageous falsehood is that ASDB is firing all Deaf individuals. There is no evidence to support this accusation. The facts are that in the past four years, ASDB has had to discharge individuals who are required to follow the policies and rules of the agency. No single individual, or group of individuals, is given special treatment. All employees are held to the same standards.

Closing the Cooperative Programs
There is no truth to the rumor that ASDB is planning to close the Cooperative Programs. To the contrary, the Cooperative Programs are legislatively mandated and serve a significant role in the continuum of services ASDB provides to students ASDB is obligated to serve across the State of Arizona. If the Cooperatives were to close tomorrow (though they are NOT), neither the Tucson campus nor the Phoenix campus could successfully meet the needs of all the students served by the Cooperatives. Firstly, the site-base schools would not be determined the LRE for many of the students. Secondly, the site-base schools would not have the space and resources to meet the number of students. Likewise, if the site-base schools were to ever close (though they are NOT), the Cooperatives do not have sufficient staff in the rural locations to meet student needs.

Closing the Tucson Campus
It is true that enrollment has declined at the Tucson Campus; however, the Tucson campus provides a residential option for ASDB and again offers a valuable component in the continuum of services provided to students. No plans are in place to close the site-base schools or the Cooperative programs. Any comments to the contrary are simply designed to create fear.

Closing the Phoenix Campus
As current enrollment continues to rise in Phoenix, the closure of PDSD makes no sense. When this topic came up three plus years ago as a cost-savings initiative, this was quickly dismissed. A need may actually exist in the future for a second campus in the Valley. Also, ASDB is working to secure the necessary funding (approximately 11 million dollars) to build a new elementary and preschool facility at PDSD, as well as a new athletic complex (5 million dollars). This, coupled with the short-term plans for a new freezer ($100,000), insulation of the gymnasium $90,000, and culinary program $45,000, serve to confirms there are no plans to close the Phoenix campus.

Closing the Dorms
ASDB has spent nearly a million dollars in the last 15 months to improve the dorms and has expended additional dollars to update the fire/emergency alert system. These dollars would not have been spent if ASDB had plans to close the dorms. Plus, ASDB has obtained another one million dollars to begin work on three more dorms (Manzanita, Palo Verde, and Pima).

Building New Dorms to convert the Campus into a new branch of the Pima County Community College System
Simply put, this is not true. Again, the dorm improvements in the past and the dorm improvements in the near future do not support such a rumor.

Shutting Down the Agricultural Program
The Tucson Campus agricultural program has not been shut down. Parts of the program have been put on hold until proper research can be conducted to ensure the agreed-upon program is operating within laws, codes, policies, rules, and procedures. ASDB’s goal is to build a viable agricultural program that minimizes liability exposure to ASDB, and ensures health and safety issues for students.

The truth is as follows. It was reported to me in February that goats were on loan and two students needed to finish their SAE Supervised Agricultural Experience. I allowed the pigs to stay until the project at the Fair had been completed to avoid a negative impact to students. The Agricultural Teacher was asked to remove all animals by last week after students had finished their projects. The Teacher was told that if more time was necessary for students to participate at the Fair, he needed to let us know. Instead, he opted to have the pigs slaughtered and goats removed from campus. The Teacher also directed blame for the shortcomings of the program on dorm staff. Unfortunately, students have been told that ASDB administration shut down the program and ordered the slaughter of animals. These lies were told to students by those individuals who caused the violations and who blamed ASDB administration.

In addition, I learned that the necks of chickens were being snapped and the dead chickens were being tossed into the metal trashcans at the back of campus. This, among other things, exposed staff and students to unnecessary diseases.

ASDB took what was believed to be the appropriate action. The fear mongering and “bullying” of a select group of individuals will not be tolerated.

Summary
As Superintendent, I am accountable to nine Board members and am tasked to ensure the health and safety of both staff and students, and compliance with laws, policies, regulations, rules and procedures, with the goal to minimize ASDB’s liability exposures. Unfortunately, individuals have resorted to personal attacks and lies in an effort to punish me and others who have acted in the best interests of ASDB. I ask you to continue all the wonderful work you are all doing as we address these matters.

Robert Hill
Superintendent
Administration
Arizona State Schools for the Deaf and the Blind
Robert.Hill@asdb.az.gov
Office: 520.770.3704
VP: 520.762.7882
Fax: 520.770.3711

* How Low Can He Go? 2013 ASDB ASL Literacy Summer Camp Cancelled

It has been confirmed that the 2013 ASL Literacy Summer Camp has been cancelled at the order of Hill.

The program was to have its third session in as many years before unceremoniously getting yanked and had been designed to help improve student literacy rates during a time where they often stagnate.

The program had been widely admired and supported by students, staff, and parents, and had even drawn attendance from other states as well.

The camp was one of the absurd justifications Hill had used in his rationale for not renewing Asst. Supt. Dr. Nancy Amann's contract. Hill claimed that there was inadequate staff supervision and medical coverage.

Parents and staff involved with the 2012 camp session have confirmed that Hill's allegation of inadequate supervision is blatantly false and that the issue of medical coverage was moot when each and every participant's parents signed a medical waiver prior to their children's attendance.

It has also been pointed out that Hill, in an email sent several years ago, stated that a "third-grade reading level is typical of graduating deaf students," and that his order to close the camp simply perpetuates this statement.

Congratulations, Hill, for maintaining a self-fulfilling prophecy.

* ASDB Student Protest Leader Turns 18 Today, Admin Can't Ask If Parents Gave Her Permission to Protest Anymore

Juliana Apfel, one of the ASDB student protest leaders, turned 18 today which means that school administrators may no longer insist that she provide proof of her parents' permission to engage in protest activities.

Ms. Apfel, now legally an adult, will be able to engage in more active protest matters instead of being hindered by adminstrators citing her status as a minor under the school's care.

Happy birthday, Ms. Apfel. We're behind you all the way.

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

The reason(s) for Nancy Hlibok-Amman's suspension have not been disclosed to protect her privacy. This is a legal requirement and Superintendent Robert Hill cannot comment or disclose. Perhaps Nancy Hlibok-Amann herself should come clean and disclose as this pertains to her privacy. Most of us, excepting those inside Nancy's "inner circle" do no know the real reasons and an only speculate. Considering the massive ASDB-"inner circle" staff incited (YES!) student protests and school walkouts, these unknown charges appear substantial. The Nancy "inner circle" gang know that these charges may end their enjoyment of position, pay, perks, and other "blessings" under Nancy and are predictably closing ranks obsfuscating, creating diversions, asserting false charges and premises, and involving the students, some as young as kindergarten(!!!)Children at that age cannot possibly comprehend what is going on! If I were a parent of a young child, I would remove my child from ASDB/PDSD and seek counsel. "Inner circle apparatchiks," are mostly Gallaudet University graduates and often belong to the same sorority as Nancy. Deja vu, this happened at Gallaudet in 1988, the so-called "DPN" movement. This movement was led by Nancy's brother, Greg Hlibok. Another prominient "player" is Harvey Goodstein, related to the Amann family and a sitting member of the Gallaudet University Board. Mr. Goodstein has injected himself into this mess, scolding the ASDB BOard, but denying in his letter that it has anything to do with family. ASDB student Nathaniel Amann, the son of Nancy (yep!) is actually the leader of the student unrest, co-incited by the "inner circle" staff. The ASDB students 5 demands are not unlike the demands that Nathaniels "Uncle Greg" and "Uncle Harvey" presented to the Gallaudet University Board in 1988. Goodstein was the advisor to Greg Hlibok back in 1988 and it was the future "Uncle Harvey" who rudely cut off Dr. Zinser while she was speaking, telling the students meeting in the auditorium "that the Gallaudet Board had not met" the rioters demands and exhorted students to walk out. Alan Amann, Nancy's husband, works for the Arizona Attorney Generals Office. He's up to his eyeballs in this mess. If the AG has to step in, the conflicts should be obvious. This family has engaged in flagrant betrayal and conflict, creating conditions where major institutions are beholden to them. How are these points not indicative of a total disregard for the public trust, that is, using State resources to ensure ones own title and position in perpetuity. The aforementioned are merely the tip of the iceberg. Anyone with a lick of sense should be able to discern what these people are doing. The Governor should not let the rule of this mob, of cronyism, nepotism and favoritism by the Amann line continue. I think I've said enough.

Anonymous said...

The reason(s) for Nancy Hlibok-Amman's suspension have not been disclosed to protect her privacy. This is a legal requirement and Superintendent Robert Hill cannot comment or disclose. Perhaps Nancy Hlibok-Amann herself should come clean and disclose as this pertains to her privacy. Most of us, excepting those inside Nancy's "inner circle" do not know the real reasons and can only speculate. Considering the massive ASDB-"inner circle" staff incited (YES!) student protests and school walkouts, these unknown charges appear substantial. The Nancy "inner circle" gang know that these charges may end their enjoyment of position, pay, perks, and other "blessings" under Nancy and are predictably closing ranks obsfuscating, creating diversions, asserting false charges and premises, and involving the students, some as young as kindergarten(!!!) Children at that age cannot possibly comprehend what is going on! If I were a parent of a young child, I would remove my child from ASDB/PDSD and seek counsel. "Inner circle apparatchiks," are mostly Gallaudet University graduates and often belong to the same sorority as Nancy. Deja vu, this happened at Gallaudet in 1988, the so-called "DPN" movement. This movement was led by Nancy's brother, Greg Hlibok. Another prominient "player" is Harvey Goodstein, related to the Amann family and a sitting member of the Gallaudet University Board. Mr. Goodstein has injected himself into this mess, scolding the ASDB Board, but denying in his letter that it has anything to do with family. ASDB student Nathaniel Amann, the son of Nancy (yep!) is actually the leader of the student unrest, co-incited by the "inner circle" staff. The ASDB students 5 demands are not unlike the demands that Nathaniels "Uncle Greg" and "Uncle Harvey" presented to the Gallaudet University Board in 1988. Goodstein was the advisor to Greg Hlibok back in 1988 and it was the future "Uncle Harvey" who rudely cut off Dr. Zinser while she was speaking, telling the students meeting in the auditorium "that the Gallaudet Board had not met" the rioters demands and exhorted students to walk out. Alan Amann, Nancy's husband, works for the Arizona Attorney Generals Office. He's up to his eyeballs in this mess. If the AG has to step in, the conflicts should be obvious. This family has engaged in flagrant betrayal and conflict, creating conditions where major institutions are beholden to them. How are these points not indicative of a total disregard for the public trust, that is, using State resources to ensure ones own title and position in perpetuity? The aforementioned are merely the tip of the iceberg. Anyone with a lick of sense should be able to discern what these people are doing. The Governor should not let the rule of this mob, of cronyism, nepotism and favoritism by the Amann line continue. I think I've said enough.

Anonymous said...

Grateful that there are some collected information. No matter who they are deaf or hearing or white, etc but our concern must be for a special deaf group that has been too long neglected - EDUCATION! Not competition. Naturally deaf students are excited about deaf staffs but they are not aware or understanding that higher educated deafies are little below intellectual level I have known them since they earned their credentials from deaf university or others that offer the programs that is for deafies. About 99% educated deafies don't understand what the difference between leadership and policy or rule completely Like for example ...having the responsibility of living with the consequences. If we adults make their problems ours, they ... So is it obvious that there are poor role models for the students at ASDB? An educational leadership and policy are "inseparable" in school. Good luck!
Ps I was born profoundly deaf and growing up in the deaf world.